$130 Telescope vs. $600 Telescope vs. $1,750 Telescope

Video quality	The size	Download

Information $130 Telescope vs. $600 Telescope vs. $1,750 Telescope

Title	:	$130 Telescope vs. $600 Telescope vs. $1,750 Telescope
Lasting	:	29.08
Date of publication	:
Views	:	1,2 jt

WARNING: This video was comment-bombed by a scammer impersonating me If you received a reply from someone about a package, that is NOT me Do not engage with them I am not on Telegram or Whatsapp, and will never run a giveaway through youtube comments or those apps Sorry for the inconvenience Hopefully Youtube can fix this problem soon! Nico
Comment from : Nebula Photos

Excellent and effective presentation I have watched other presentations that you have made on this channel and I congratulate you I am glad that I had this opportunity to watch this video Compared to the products presented in this video, I also have something similar Two refracting telescopes: one is for terrestrial observations and the second is for astronomical observations The first telescope is a VANGUARD HD 20-60X82mm refractor, its objective is an ED type doublet with Argon gas for the anti-fogging and anti-condensation effectbrThe second refractor telescope is a Tecnosky APO 70X420mm triplet with two ED FPL55 lenses More importantly, I managed to purchase as eyepieces two pieces of SUPER ED type from ARTESKY of 12mm and respectively 32mm focal lengthbrRegarding astrophotography, I am a beginner I only managed to take a few shots of the moon and mountain landscapes and the world of animals with the help of a smartphonebrHonestly, I would like to be able to make videos on the planets and deepsky objects, but I'm asking for your advice on what I should do specifically? Should I buy a special camera for astrophotography? Is it not possible to take astrophotographs of the planets or DSO with the smartphone?brAnticipated thanks for the answer?
Comment from : ASTRONOMIA ACASA

Though there are many thing's one telesope may include, which can make it compared to another of the exact same make and model more expensive There is but one thing that will and would cause a telescope to be more expensive if and when they are both the same model but different make; And that is the "OPTIC'S"brbrThe same goes for the various len's, one can purchase cheap, one can purchase more expensive Why if and when the optic's are of the same quality, would one purchase one that cost more Knowledge of what determine's good optic's from better and better to best Is the key to purchasing the best scope one can afford Purchasing the biggest with poor optic's compared to purchase a smaller with better optic's To the amature is what they generaly do But the avid back yard astronomer with some year's of experience know's That it's the optic's that is important Not the size and shape or additonal "FREE" add on's
Comment from : Wm G Thilgen Jr

Definitely a case of you get what you pay for It's all in the optics Great set of tests Thanks Nico
Comment from : Chewligan

Lovely presentation, my man Thanks!
Comment from : Thomas Adkins

Good product took me only five minutes to set up on my savage arm 22 lr over all good for the price would definitely buy another
Comment from : epickiller s

Before i buy the svbony which mount should i buy does any fit ?? any specific ones
Comment from : Vash 00

orion still pretty good for the price :)
Comment from : realmic2011

cush it better
Comment from : sam josephson

$1,750? For $1,449, one can buy a Sky-Watcher 12" f/393 Quattro Imaging Newtonian Telescope (OTA Only) That's 90mm compared to 305mm Might seem to some that a fancy refractor is over priced
Comment from : Just Another Amature Astronomer

V good informative review
Comment from : DuderinoDeux

Rotation is essential I'd say even just for observational astronomy if balancing an issue though length weight dependant Richfields can be small portable and a bargain
Comment from : DuderinoDeux

How does this Svbony compare to the SV48P? I'm thinking about buying the 48p but i have no clue
Comment from : Alan Watts

Always good and relevant topics ❤
Comment from : mikedimimd

And from where do we buy such a telescope? brI saw the Best Buy website that does not have telescopes as good as the one you explain about in the video brBut I don't know where we can get a good telescope and get close to long distances, as shown in this video?😥
Comment from : Hussam Nasser

6:15 value in this case is how much performance you get per unit of currency
Comment from : DELTACX10

It's clear to me that the Svbony captured more light There's a lot more stars which should translate into better detail, or more "effective exposure" Probably because the number of glass surfaces that 5-10 per surface (assuming they are all multicoated) are stacking not sure how many surfaces in the reducers, but I guess there's at least 2 more surfaces in the Askar
Comment from : Eduardo Avaria

How did you get rid of the blue/violet halos around the stars on the SVBONY 80? I just purchased the SVBONY and have the halos that are as bad as the Orion
Comment from : Freki ™

Rip Van Winkle is a patron, lolbrbrNice Vid, thanks for the info!
Comment from : mbrang00

A simple, "They are way overpriced" would have sufficed for me
Comment from : Salty Bits

nice profit
Comment from : No 15 Minute Cities

18:40 is what you came here for
Comment from : DJNazerene

Good vid but for visual use get a long ratio FPL-53 doublet[F/9😮]brUNBEATABLE😮😂❤STUNNING😮😮😅LUNAR❤❤VIEWS❤❤❤😮brbrNo need for a triplet and FULLY apochromatic😮❤❤❤❤❤brContrast is UNSURPASSED😮❤brbrReduce it for F/75
Comment from : PeerSpearer

What is the disadvantage of not being able to rotate the scope?
Comment from : pleappleappleap

How do you feel about long photography lenses with teleconverters? Say 1600mm f/11, or 1120mm f/16?
Comment from : pleappleappleap

I like the information, but you take too long to get started
Comment from : pleappleappleap

Thank you for this eye opening comparison For an APS-C shooter the Svbony seems to offer very good results
Comment from : AnStef

Tell me you have a video that falsifies Flat Earth Theory
Comment from : Heart Of The Streets Productions

Chinese 😅
Comment from : Evilleader

600$ looks finebr1750 is too much for just 5 better image
Comment from : Star Girl

Hi, I started AP last year and have 3 scopes now and still use my ST80 to this day brA few notes about the ST-80:br1 My dew shield gets off of mine, but i think i have the older modelbr2 To reduce gradients, a good and easy tactic is to color the side of your lens with a black permanent marker br3 I needed to add an extension to my camera to be able to get proper focusbr4 it's 100$ frikin dollabr5 I have been able to produce nice images, most problems can be treated in editing
Comment from : Jeremy Boisvert

Q: the one for $1700, what do I need to connect my Sony A7r lll ???
Comment from : Arts Model Station

How would images from these telescopes compare to images taken from a Sony A7RIV camera with lenses like the 135, 100-400, 200-600, 400, or even the 600?
Comment from : Ed Lazor

The Askar looks the best , I'm 'Team SV' though so I shouldn't say that really
Comment from : Mr Tambourine Man

I've wanted one of these since high school and know nothing about them I'm about to pull the trigger so thank you for this video, I really needed this info I just wanted to know why I was spending all the extra money and for me I have no other way to learn other than YT
Comment from : danny nimmo

What is the best one to get for highest quality image for PC out of ANY scope?>
Comment from : Dragonsyph

Hey Nico, did you ever find out what is causing that vigentting at 20:55 on the Askar 80PHQ? I am using a Canon eoe 6D, I seems to have the same problem, but in my case the bottom is vignetted, and the top right left corners are too, the rest seems find? Pls let me know if you ever found anything!
Comment from : The Physics Dude

For sure a beginner who wants a good telescope but doesn’t want to get something that will be over my head or too complicated, it’s complicated enough just doing research on what to buy Still very confused Subbed and liked Thank you
Comment from : Papo Pagan

$130 dollarsnot in my countrytriple that price
Comment from : Klaus

How telescope to DSO deep sky photography $200 -$300 dolars ?
Comment from : 40° Na Sombra

Excellent video!, to be honest the little Orion and terrible at all
Comment from : Paul Myrus

Very interesting I already learned it’s absolutely not worth to me, spending way more than the €160 I just want to see the center for live object viewing Mainly planets
Comment from : Geoff Vane

The James Webb Telescope would be all of them
Comment from : Wildlife Warrior

I have a question about the scammer impersonating issue Was the impersonator's comment name also highlighted with the oval shaped grey background around its name ? Something similar happened to me on a different channel and the scammer name had the oval shaped background of the channel owner, he invited me on telegram and there i quickly realized he was trying to scam money out of me and trashed him I want to clarify if this was the actual channel owner or not
Comment from : Goognam Gowi

Star watching is the most peaceful activity
Comment from : Goognam Gowi

Great start but what about tripod, none have a tripod and that is almost equally important
Comment from : Graph Guy

So no difference
Comment from : Polaski

should sell one for a haircut
Comment from : Dylan Hardy

So long story short: What you pay what you get lol i need my time back
Comment from : Chagi Chagi

Will the 80mm SBVony work OK on a Skywatcher star adventurer pro 2i ??
Comment from : Mr Tambourine Man

Thank you, you made me decide I am gonna get Askar for my daughter as her first telescope We will go out of the city, set it up, and take many beautiful pictures!
Comment from : overmind06

At 4:21 there is a cat meowing or a baby crying
Comment from : Ibroz

What you see is determined by a) the diameter of the objective, whether it is a lens or miorror b) the optical quality (perfection) of the objective's figuring (c) by the seeing conditions where a person observes There IS NO pat answer for every variable But common wisdom is and always will be the diameter of the objective lens or mirror determining what you can see
Comment from : Henry Horner

Which one can see the moon Landing sites?
Comment from : Jim Steinway

I have an old celestron comet catcher that really impresses me Its got a fantastic mirror and when paired with a decent eyepice like tele vue, boy is it a bargain!
Comment from : tony b

what is the best telescope to take pictures of space?
Comment from : Sam Wilson

I get daja vu when i saw you
Comment from : h

Give me the $130 one
Comment from : Jimmy Demello

Your videos are incredibly informative and helpful, so thank you for all the great work! The Askar design seems great I'm thinking about the 107 rather than the 80 though (I already have a WO Redcat 71 Trying to figure out what kinds of FOV the 107 would offer for galaxies Anyway, outstanding content, thanks again!
Comment from : Doug Berger

HELP?So, which would be a better purchase A 71mm triplet or 81mm doublet? both same price at Williams Optics, both FPL53 glass I'm looking for image quality comparison, all other things being equal
Comment from : jster91

Well done! Thank you!!
Comment from : Zachrey Helmberger

All life in water, on land, and all these planets out there!!!! Wow God is amazing
Comment from : Zahir

NGC 7023
Comment from : Alex Rdx

Nothing
Comment from : Laura Swanson

I am pretty sure the square vinette is because it is an architectural lens BTW, the term for the color issues is chromatic aberration
Comment from : MID-CITY LIVE!

Do you have suggestions for smart phone adapters?
Comment from : Jason Smith

We should just quit making cheep crap
Comment from : Joshua Whitworth

This video was perfect for where I'm at I know very little about telescopes but I've been on the hunt for an amateur setup & have been interested in how ball-park price range translates into visual quality I know there's variables within each bracket but i feel this has been a sound general unpacking
Comment from : HAYDS510

The Celestron 1 1/4 variable zoom is the cream of the crop even for collimation …
Comment from : Bored

I did not have the right stuff with the 1 1/4 inch on the orion so I center it with a 2 1/2 gap between me and the eye piece to hit the moon 🤭 I just wanted to center my potential guide scope
Comment from : Bored

For the price and quality, Svbony is my pick
Comment from : TTP LLC

Great comparison, this is very helpful I wonder how the differences would look like with a mono setup with narrowband filters, especially when combined to a color image like with the hubble palette for example maybe an idea for an follow-up video?
Comment from : Ferdigrafie

I have a NextStar Celestron 6 that's almost twice as much as you most expensive one I got it from my brother before he passed on [he was going to get a better one] and haven't gotten the tracking to work with the star align You have to use three bright stars but 6 times in a row "alignment failed" is displayed I live on a mountain at 4K feet which provide perfect atmospheric conditions but unfortunately have a limited field of view due to pine trees I thought about connecting a DSLR to it but haven't researched it since it has standard eye piece optic holes After he passed on I got some real expensive eyepieces he had kept for his to be new telescope I'll have to wait for summer again when it's warmer and commit myself to operate it in the early morning hours before the sun comes up because here in Northern California that is when the brightest stars come up so I can see if I can get it to align with those bright stars that are sure to be in the database I know the database is in the motorized pedestal because you can align it with the hand control even though you can use a smartphone app connected via WiFi which is actually easier
Comment from : DrHarryT

Nice vid Thorough analysis and thoughtful conclusions I love that (glass?) hex table! Could you share the specs of the product?
Comment from : HOOS-karl

Focal length is 1 clue
Comment from : ShadowOps Airman1

I've had my eye on the Stellamira 90mm ED triplet for a bit, it's decently fast at 540mm f6 and you can get a reducer / flattener to bring that to 432mm f48
Comment from : Neovo903

Excellent assessment on these scopes!
Comment from : Dan Sharayko

What a very informative video Thank you so much!
Comment from : lovely poets

Hi what do you think of Meade Polaris 90 EQ refractor telescope? Does it come with ED glass? Read some reviews it's a good scope, and I bought it but got the feeling only the stand mount is good, but the telescope might be not that good to see good images of Jupiter and more distant planets
Comment from : Kockar hobby

Hey dude,i wanna ask something brHow to get USD without living in US :D?
Comment from : Vian Dharmawan

Correct me if I'm wrong, still new to this, but really want to do astrophotography, but I find it quite confusingbrbrHow come these have a quite high F Value (over F5) compared to a camera lens that is suitable (F2 and below for most optimal) for astrophotography?
Comment from : Zyx

Man I like your hair, looks cool))
Comment from : Johnny Utah

Great comparison Nice breakdown between these refractors
Comment from : Dun Ringill

It makes me sad that Galileo didn’t have this telescope
Comment from : S B

i thought the orion was just fine not much difference to me ESPECIALLY for the price
Comment from : michael carman

I would love to see you do this exercise but compare one telescope (80, 120, 150, C925 ect) against a couple different size sensors (Full frame, ASPC, IMX533) I am curious to see what effect different sensor sizes will have on the field of view I think this could help with choosing my next camera I have my eye on the 2600 right now because I would like to get a wider field of view for larger targets I have a Esprit 120ed and a C925 I am also shooting with the asi533 mono and the asi294 One shot Would my money be better place getting a good 80 like this ASKAR or is the camera the more versatile choice I guess what I am asking is to actually see the effects of image scale
Comment from : Scale Model Enthusiast

Excellent vid & info! Mahalo
Comment from : ARTISTIC MANA

I wonder how it compares to a Sigma 150-600mm FFrame camera lens I think they have 2 versions, the Sport, which is almost $2k, and the lighetr which is $900 Tamron also has a $900 in the 150-600mm focal length That would be a great comparison to see which has more zoom, and image quality
Comment from : Phil Indeblanc

Well… that’s great 😊… so for the rest of us mere mortals… you know the every day mum and dad folks… who sees a telescope in the Aldi store and buy it for our 8 year old all I hear from you is gobbledygook with your ED refraction lens … whatever the fuck that is my wife and I are both medical Doctors… so, we aren’t stupid… but seriously dude first off? get a fucken haircut… second … ? stop trying to be a wanker … 3rd ? … don’t make a dumbarse video about comparisons…all this video does is feed into some narrative that promotes your own narcissism… and get a fucken haircut… Woodstock was last century
Comment from : Dee Bee