Best Cordless Vacuum? $99 HART vs $250 Ryobi, $300 LG, $349 SHARK, $439 Tineco, $750 Dyson

Video quality	The size	Download

Information Best Cordless Vacuum? $99 HART vs $250 Ryobi, $300 LG, $349 SHARK, $439 Tineco, $750 Dyson

Title	:	Best Cordless Vacuum? $99 HART vs $250 Ryobi, $300 LG, $349 SHARK, $439 Tineco, $750 Dyson
Lasting	:	21.33
Date of publication	:
Views	:	1,6 jt

Frames Best Cordless Vacuum? $99 HART vs $250 Ryobi, $300 LG, $349 SHARK, $439 Tineco, $750 Dyson

Description Best Cordless Vacuum? $99 HART vs $250 Ryobi, $300 LG, $349 SHARK, $439 Tineco, $750 Dyson

Comments Best Cordless Vacuum? $99 HART vs $250 Ryobi, $300 LG, $349 SHARK, $439 Tineco, $750 Dyson

Legend!
Comment from : Don Julio

How about best steam vacuum?
Comment from : Ezequiel Morin III

Should do a round 2 but this time with the smaller battery hand vacuum ones
Comment from : Francisco Lozada

I feel like Dyson in theory, is the same as Apple and their products just like a cult
Comment from : Indira Demiraj

I wish you would have added the medium and lowest motor setting runtimes but I know your the best reviewer of all time
Comment from : Billy Johns

It would be great if you could add an update to this video with the Miele cordless vacuum Ps - Project Farm is defiantly one of my favourite!!
Comment from : Rob Johnston

All I know is, these things are expensive When did vacuums hit the 300 dollar mark?
Comment from : Ex8

Another advantage of the Dyson is it's multi stage cyclone is more effective and so doesn't require frequent filter cleaning like all the others You didn't check how clogged the filters were The air flow will quickly drop otherwise
Comment from : Kevin Ison

Please consider a do over with a Foppapedretti 25kpa and a Moosoo XC1, both are available for around $100 As always I rechecked your videos when considering a purchase
Comment from : Gary Groundpounder

I had that lg vacuum It’s so bad! Don’t buy it
Comment from : Hilda Doe

I know its been a year, do these results hold firm today? Im liking the dyson
Comment from : 2witha Lakeview

Were u adjusting the head height during the goldfish/Cheerio test? Just asking because the Dyson was still set to the middle height
Comment from : Justin Tara

You should test other tool brand vacuums as well, since almost everyone has one
Comment from : Lukas

Would be great if you could repeat this test and include the new Kobalt I know it's probably not going to happen anytime soon Anyways, thanks!
Comment from : Jont Noneya

scientific method vacuum chan
Comment from : Katherine M

Could add filtration as i work with elderly and suicidal kids Always a pleasure to watch ur contentfun informative and inspiring ❤
Comment from : Jeff Thurb

Uh oh pulling out the big bucks on this one
Comment from : Abner cricket

I bought the Miele I love their other products in my house Been using their washer and dryer, dishwasher for 30 years I hope it compares on the vacuum
Comment from : John Powell

I’m actually going to buy one of these tomorrow and I really appreciate your hard work The economics of it all should be accounted for a Dyson really expensive is it worth the extra money for the percentage difference in performance?
Comment from : The Way

I can see the Hart lasting longer in battery time and being weaker than the others as not just a product of it's price, but also use-case It's probably meant to be used on job sites or construction or workshops where light cleaning is good enough and more battery life is more important than power Beside use-case, I have also noticed personally that fiber brushes are more effective with larger things but struggle with getting hair stuck on them You can look at the brush designs on the ones you tested and see the correlation Overall, I feel you definitely get what you pay for in most cases with vacuums
Comment from : Zanano