Forgery Experts Explain 5 Ways To Spot A Fake

Video quality	The size	Download

Information Forgery Experts Explain 5 Ways To Spot A Fake | WIRED

Title	:	Forgery Experts Explain 5 Ways To Spot A Fake \| WIRED
Lasting	:	11.48
Date of publication	:
Views	:	4,4 jt

You guys are brilliant! Wow! Thank you
Comment from : davidhunternyc

Good luck with the provenance research of a golden age painting
Comment from : Lao - Ce

Interesting…… I wouldn’t recommend them although they are more for entertainment because I called them they didn’t even return a phone call… so yeah it’s a no no for me 😂 Stevie wonder can see that’s a modern forgery
Comment from : Lionel Williams

I'm still baffled as to why anyone would even like this level of abstract art, much less paying million of dollars for it
Comment from : Michael Parham

100 million dollars for a painting a monkey could make
Comment from : Rain Remnant

Whoever did the sound editing on this needs to go back and fix it
Comment from : MarkZoetrope

That’s just a mess of paint
Comment from : yinggamer 7

100 million dollars for that mess?? Some people have more money than brain's😅
Comment from : Hoani Koria

Imagine having to forge a painting that looks like the floor of a McDonald's where every single bottle of sauce exploded
Comment from : DIAMOND MEMER

3:16 to 3:19, a lovely splash of Paganini's No 24 played on the xylophone That weirdly made my day (since I was playing it this morning!)
Comment from : Liam Neville Violist

0:58 - "[yells] bThere's a lot of!/b [whispers] claims " - I just spotted another fake! That wasn't a real full sentence! Fake fake fake!
Comment from : Liam Neville Violist

Somebody show this guy what a Star Trek phaser looks ike
Comment from : Lola LaRue

I would enjoy seeing this same duo examining something that is consider a "good fake"
Comment from : Jamie Joy

His speech has been cut so much by the editors
Comment from : Gerald S

And I thought Mondriaan was lazy
Comment from : hun dun

Damning documentation
Comment from : White Blogger Black Specs

Who cares if a Pollock is fake?
Comment from : Bluest

This is the kind of analysis that would have blown up he Hitler diaries instantly But those who wanted to believe they ware real did not want real forensic scientists to have a look brThe proves old, well known, most important rule, when forging anything: Present it to people who WANT to believe it is genuine
Comment from : Octopussyist

These two 'experts' with magnifying glasses examining this cheap painting like Sherlock Holmes would, in a 'let's-call-it-our-lab' nearly empty room, look more fake than the painting itself Maybe it is their parttime job Maybe I am wrong and biased by all the flashy science/forensic labs that we see in Hollywood movies But everything looks so off and staged just for the purpose of this video
Comment from : Bodawei

If I finally watch this video, will the algod stop recommending it to me already?
Comment from : Geekimus Prime

Snobs who are willing to pay a 100 million dollars for this just need to be ripped off
Comment from : Bob Bob

This drip painting is junk One hundred million for this is a farce It's not even worth $100
Comment from : Regan

You can tell it is a fake within 5 seconds of looking at it
Comment from : Vonwra

Da Vinci said - "Details make perfection, and perfection is not a detail"
Comment from : Pavis Creations

Very cool video!
Comment from : kje3429

useful info
Comment from : Jeffs Little Engine Service

Oh yeah?
Comment from : jaye see

money and art are opposites if you do it for money, it's not art if you argue about who made something that you like, you are missing the point of life
Comment from : Jesse G

How many paintings has this guy faked?
Comment from : Stroheim333

Staples were around in the 50s
Comment from : Jeff Mahoney

Why is G-Eazy talking like that?
Comment from : InvaderWiz005

I wouldn't buy even a real Pollock but I do this with all sorts of antiques You do it once and you feel very intimidated, but after you get used to an object you can see things more clearly This research approach works for everything (internet claims, ebay, art, dissertation etc) This was great
Comment from : Stine W

BRITAIN'S No1 ART FORGER - MAX BRANDRETT, THE LIFE OF A CHEEKY FAKER biography is out now!
Comment from : anthony valentine

what if just what if he changed how he painted but its original?
Comment from : red rosie

Bit too easy that one
Comment from : kingerz

What I would love to see accompanying THIS video?brA video of the shenanigans with the fraudsters think they're successfully pulling a fast one
Comment from : denisethepainter

If it was real, I would not consider to buy it for a $100 million
Comment from : Fazal Malik

Watch the Last Vermeer "The paintings look the same but now they're worth pennies"
Comment from : William Domb

It amazes me how people think this is art Real or fake, a child could do this There is 0 skill involved Anyone saying otherwise is trying very hard to convince themselves they didn't waste money on an art degree
Comment from : RepairTech

It’s a Jackson Bollocks
Comment from : Johnman

Thiago is cute
Comment from : Wabi Sabi

youtube/pQmr7Yp-WL4
Comment from : NickVenture1

Fake is better than the so called original, period Now what? This is a piece of crap art No need to evaluate this sort of art
Comment from : Dzistone

You know what the real difference is between a fake Pollock painting and real one? About seven or eight zeros
Comment from : Wanderer

Doctor Taylor has Leonard Hofstadter energy, and I love it
Comment from : The Wookster

There is a feeling telling me that even this video is fake Why would someone who tries to fake a Jackson Pollock not know his death date?
Comment from : Mohamad Kh

5:24 the smell of tea is definitely guarantee of a fake Pollock They should have rubbed burbon instead!
Comment from : José da Cunha Filho

The fakes are better than the original ones Or just as sh*tty
Comment from : Hala Hala

This is proof that abstract art is complete nonsense
Comment from : Zeta9966

I wonder how many fakes that were painted by Eric Hebborn are currently passed as real McCoys in museums around the world
Comment from : Max D

Mr Sydney Harvey?
Comment from : Saramust die

Noted Ser
Comment from : BlurryBit

I wouldn't want even the real one near me
Comment from : Cptain Volo

Uh…yea…but let’s not forgot that the forgery actually has more skill to it than does an actual Pollock
Comment from : D Mac

alr someone tell me why that is considered art while some paintings of actual stuff that took a lot of effort, and look just flawless, get hated on and sold for 50$
Comment from : Mateusz Zieliński

What difference does it make who made it, they are all rubbishbrAbsolute load of Pollocks
Comment from : Mark Latimer

the background is so white
Comment from : Arthur Ting

blah blah blah so around 20 of stuff sold by christie's, sotheby's are fake and they turn a blind eye $$$
Comment from : frannie swannie

quite interesting video, seems like a hard job, not to goof up, i like brreal Pollock or fake Pollock, both are cold garbage bro
Comment from : bad medicine man

Oh noes, my random paint splatters that could have been made by a toddler aren't "original"!
Comment from : drxym

who cares if it's fake or not, this painting is rubbish
Comment from : MrKleiner

They left the name "Harvey" on the document for the first anonymous person and it said he was in CA I just hope it was Harvey Winestein lol
Comment from : Synthetic Rabbit

I want to hear these guys talk about NFTs
Comment from : Lian Rangkuty

100 Million people are stupid Go feed the homeless and poor, rather than some 4 year old could paint
Comment from : Lasvegasmiddlebetslots

Still, I can't believe that the investment required to properly forge art outweighs the potential benefit The techniques of art forensics are known, and widely published And a mistake like titanium in white paint is just very basic
Comment from : De Waard

Pollock himself was a fake, so there's that
Comment from : kav kaz

How on earth can this be called art? People are strange
Comment from : Markus A B

10:30 nascent Dalek impersonation
Comment from : Greg Veit

THEY ACT PROFESSIONAL BUT ALOT OF FAKES HAVE BEEN APROVED BY THEM
Comment from : Katie Barratt

Ok I can hold a cigarette in my mouth and drip some colors around a canvas Let me give this painting thing a shot
Comment from : D Yes

I am such a rookie Thanks for telling me how to hide my traces
Comment from : Miyuki

These animal crossing tutorials are getting way out of hand!
Comment from : oscar rosales

Biden said it was real like Covid
Comment from : John Hanselman

Very cool video Love Jackson Pollock
Comment from : Jeanine Ross

Here's the stupid thing about art If you need a professional to tell you the difference between the real and the fake, they should be worth the same amount of money Art is art and it doesn't matter who made it
Comment from : Aidan303

I'm guessing a real expert on Pollock would know the ways he built his canvas That would probably give away most fakes
Comment from : O D

2:42 you’d think they’d at least get his death date right…
Comment from : Jason Lovi

That is not artwork
Comment from : Mitchell Jack

Looks like an old drop cloth to me I think I'll get my old drop cloths out and put them in a frame see if I can get some money for them
Comment from : Mike Smithey

I feel bad for Sydney Or Sidney Hope you didn't pay 100 million for it
Comment from : Chris Lehman

This would be an excellent reality show Walking the audience through different artists, their different signature styles Interviews with the owners and how they came into ownership of the paintings The investigations, and the owners' responses to finding out if their painting is a fraud or notbrbrMake this show With these guys
Comment from : Last, First

There’s no way someone would be willing to pay $100 million for that 😳 I don’t care how many times you explain why it’s worth that much, it will never make sense to me
Comment from : kittym96

this is cool name and generic name
Comment from : Foxxi Angel

Pretty easy If you are watching or reading CNN, MSNBC, Wired, Now This, the NYT, Axios, TYT, CBS, Buzzfeed, Vice or a Democrat is speaking its fake List is not exhaustive
Comment from : THE Kids

Just like Archie Bunkers said on an episode of All In The Family saidbr "A MONKEY COULD HAVE PAINTED THAT"! (Archie was right)!
Comment from : NIGHTMARE ACCOMPLICE

I don’t understand how can this mess be accepted as a piece or art No matter who did this sh*t
Comment from : Laszlo Peter Urmenyi

He primed the canvas and there are clearly areas that appear to be barebrThe area of restoration is where you can see bare canvas
Comment from : Patricia Feehan

people who would pay money for this trash are the soul cause of the main problem with this planet
Comment from : No No

Human are stupid
Comment from : Thomas Tsai

If it's not signed, how can it be a fake?brBut I think even fakes are not problematic, at least when the artist is deceased Either it's a good painting or not The art market is a quite ridiculous thing
Comment from : Aljoscha Long