Dr. Neil Turok -

Video quality	The size	Download

Information Dr. Neil Turok - "From zero to infinity, and beyond!"

Title	:	Dr. Neil Turok - "From zero to infinity, and beyond!"
Lasting	:	1.12.59
Date of publication	:
Views	:	151 rb

Euler's e-Pi-i 1-0-infinity, beyond Eternity-now Singularity-point reciprocation-recirculation positioning, perception paradox holographic resolution
Comment from : David Wilkie

What a wonderful person I don't have much, but I would love to donate what I can
Comment from : Whirled Peas

Maybe they can use some of their genius to figure out the audio system
Comment from : Tom Sawyer

"Vacuum energy is repulsive" is the most recent joke in physics, certainly not the oldest
Comment from : Martin del Mazo

i would like to know how time is really a knowable thing at the big bang, Light hasnt even been created yet so how you measure or estimate 400,000 years of one stage or another is maybe not knowable
Comment from : wizardoflawz

IF its true, that the materia that exploded in BB will not collapse back to itself, it must be that there is significantly more materia in the universe, than has been observed so far
Comment from : Taneli Lehtonen

Interesting how Turok uses the phrase as far as we know, the universe started as a hot BB, even in reality the earliest information we have is from BB, but surely materia didn't come to be at any point, but has always been
Comment from : Taneli Lehtonen

But why would objects not scale up as well? They are filled mostly with the same space they claim is scaling up Seems to be a logic issue here
Comment from : Khufu

Neil is looking more and more convincing everyday, especially with the new data coming back about the Hubble tension
Comment from : isonlynameleft

34:35 Dr Turok says, “It was almost perfectly smooth” Thus does Turok return to the SWERVE (*clinamen*) of Lucretius — of Epicurus & Democritus, of the first Atomists: bClinamen/b (derived from clīnāre, to incline) is the Latin name Lucretius gave to the unpredictable SWERVE of atoms, in order to celebrate the Atomistic doctrine of Epicurus
Comment from : John Siman

infinity is a concept of the mind it can not exist in reality even math breaks down and gives up on infinity
Comment from : tim walling

On topic, or "duplicitous" dualistic Title perhaps, we are, and live in the Infinity, eternal Singularity of e-Pi-i cause-effect, balanced omnidirectional-dimensional logarithmic metastability, some log-antilog Fluxion-Integral 0-1-2-ness Perspective probability floating "beyond" 1-0-infinity limits embedded probability, ONE-INFINITY QM-TIME Completeness brbrConformal Field Condensation CCC, implies "beyond ONE-INFINITY" refers to default combinations and permutations of potential possibilities positioning-> eternal Reciproction-recirculation pulse-evolution differentiates, (Calculus In-form-ation), of temporal Being (The Orientation since ancient times to awareness of conscious existence)
Comment from : David Wilkie

Canada has potential Not anymore it seems
Comment from : baldrbraa

Such a shame that this has only got 143 comments How we will look upon Neil turok and wish we had the time to see and listen to him in person Great professor and great at explaining what he knows
Comment from : PROBLEMS WITH MARK

Where did that "history of the universe" image come from? I'd like a copy of it
Comment from : Michael Lilly

Some pretty extraordinary information presented here, though he's not really precise in his use of terms For instance early on, in saying the world is not a thing (but a function) he is using "world" analogously , and not differentiating between the level of the (macroscopic) sense-world available to our senses, which is a thing, and the quantam level, which is not For that matter, even a function is a thing, a mathematical being
Comment from : Michael Lilly

All these brilliant minds and we can't explain the simple orbital movements of galaxies Instead of inventing dark matter to plug up errors in our calculations how about revisiting and reexamining our flawed assumptions Some possibly flawed assumptions 1 Speed of light is constant 2 Redshift implies moving away There have been experiments and or observations that contradict both
Comment from : Owyn Pham

Charming Fun Interesting Informative Invigorating Imaginative Inspiring ! Both, Dr Neil Turok and his lecture !
Comment from : MrVoayer

Thank you, infinite intelligence
Comment from : Den & Dennis

A brilliant and virtuous man One I hope to meet some day
Comment from : L111GTV

The 2011 Nobel Prize in physics was awarded today to Saul Perlmutter at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Brian Schmidt at the Australian National Lab and Adam Reiss at Johns Hopkins University for their discovery of the accelerating expansion of the universe Big crunch will never happen Wrong
Comment from : Tigran Ohanyan

The inexpensive clave independently hum because makeup conventionally park absent a neighborly dashboard steadfast, scientific spinach
Comment from : coopers chreiberazki

Space is fake and earth is flat this video is a pile of crap
Comment from : Always Level

Very suprice talking about greek woman in a painting that is not greek (when women start voting in your civilise world Mr?) I give you an advice Mr uneducate about Hellenic history, stick with your numbers and stop interfere with greek woman and this unecesery comments because is not your territory and is not true women born heroes and philosophers in Ancient Greece with the help of a man dont forget this! So stop misleading people, do your job and educate your self before you talk about greek women! Thanks, by the way good luck with your project !
Comment from : SΩΜΑ-DO Healing Movements

31:13 - How do we know it's going to keep going to infinity? He just said earlier we don't really know what the vacuum energy is It could behave in more or less any way - until we understand it to some degree it seems foolish to talk about its dynamics as though we KNOW
Comment from : KipIngram

27:09 - Except according to Lerner those abundances of the light elements predicted by the Big Bang are wrong He claims observations show abundances much lower than what the theory calls for, and that gets even worse when you note that natural processes since the Big Bang have continued to create more of them We're not talking small errors here - we're talking gross, enormous mismatchesbr brSo, at the very least the claim that the theory predicts light element abundances is contested But Turok just tossed it out here as though it's an ordained fact, and he represents the authority of science to this audience So they're all going to go home with an incorrect belief about the state of science Not good I haven't checked any of Lerner's claims, but the nature of his claims is "checkable" Made me wonder how many other things are being handed to me as settled and without doubt that really aren't We btrust/b these people to tell stuff to us straight - when they don't (when they brush aside controversies and so on) they are letting us down
Comment from : KipIngram

Wonderful Amazing minds
Comment from : Bright Sunshine

Yep, zero-infinity cause-effect @dt, temporal holographic dimensionalitybr-----brAn outstanding presentation of the question implied by the Theoretical Limits, zero-infinity cause-effect connection-containment is Singularity-Duality of the Holographic Principle Imagery projection-drawing Actuality
Comment from : David Wilkie

It's umm ahh, an ahh, mathematized ahh uhh magnetizm english accent magnetic fields amm uh hh ahh so ahh oh bcauhz God Damn
Comment from : r34ct

Thats the stupidest placement for a lecture lectern I have ever seen So ugly and distracting with everyone walking by in the background Great talk, though
Comment from : Paul Dirac

7:10 pretty sure it's Plato and Aristotle not Plato and Socrates
Comment from : Andrew Wells

The lecture from which the idea of zero-infinity difference distribution by expansion/inflation of Time Timing in Eternity-now was reconceived, and is the projection-drawing in perspective idea of the hologram "Follow the (cause-effect) action", without the identifying labels in terms of QM-TIMESPACE Principle In-form-ation formulae, ie the Quantum Operator format of AM-FM interference positioning Image patterns of constant creationbrbr"Beyond Infinity" reference could be a thought experiment, toy model used for a Mathematical disproof No connection, no logic, no-thing-now eternally at zero-infinity difference, i-reflection/symmetry-balance Origin that has been assumed to be "something from nothing" basis of BBT, which is actually the "exploded view" of resonances from the inside and outside simultaneously/synchronouslybrbr(Assembly of a math-philosophy observational commentary is something like a kid's scrapbook, but so it goes)
Comment from : David Wilkie

Gravitational waves have been detected, alan guth theory of inflation is winning
Comment from : Danny Brook

Beyond infinity? Wow Medication time
Comment from : nick nock

Excellent talk Very enjoyable
Comment from : Dr10Jeeps

The continuum representing the integers doesn't help us to understand infinity Complex Analysis (Riemann sphere) enables us to represent infinity (at the poles) and defines the continuum as the circumference of a circle with infinite radius, so the continuum is no more a straight line A circle has no beginning or no end (infinity) Riemann sphere also provide the mathematical model of quantum computing function (Maldacena), in which the binary states of 0 and 1 can be superimposed to give infinite dimensional state as intermediate between 0 and 1, fabricating a error-correcting QC at room temperature Phase transition transforms non-life matter into life, which is also an error- correcting QC function at room temperature (repairing 50-70 billion damaged cells daily at 9999 efficiency and at lightning speed) giving rise to consciousness, intelligence, meme, etc, not to mention greed, love, hate, passion, creativity, memory, spirituality, etc
Comment from : Naimul Haq

The LHC is never going to give a clue as to what gravity is except Electricity, Magnetism and Gravity are all one of the same that has baffled scientists for millennium Everything is electric from the sub atomic level to the universe Extra dimensions are pure lunacy together with "gravitons" and "photons" they are both fields A Singularity is a Black Hole where the electric field contains only Protons and emits Electrons The theories put forward here and other places are fiction not fact
Comment from : John B

It's actually Plato and Aristotle in the center of the painting (but it's still a great lecture)
Comment from : UncleZhou49

"Window Clings"
Comment from : Lisa Noone

Anyone ever play the game Turok?
Comment from : Odysseus

In science this fact has always put things in perspective, you can block a alpha particle with a piece of tablet paper, but if you ingest this particle it will kill you the same as a well placed bullet !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment from : Cosmoslogic

Dr Turok, Dinosaur hunter
Comment from : Dessert Storm

If the Universe did not provide 'liveable' conditions - we would not be here, watching this video would we? Suppose the universe had been 'born' radically different - and apparently hostile to life as we know it ? Would life simply not also have been shaped quite differently? Its an "Ouroboros" speculation i think - the snake that eats its own tail :P
Comment from : contemplatico

There are distractions from people walking in the hallway outside the lecture room appearing in the small glass windows on the door behind the speaker from time to time Easily remedied by blocking glass with removable plastic or wooden panels or simple plastic blinds or curtains Thank you
Comment from : Victor Gaw

Is it feasible that everything we know and all mater and time is us at the other end of a black hole that we know so much/little about and that this is an on-going regurgitation of the mater/energy from a different space/time? That the first 400,000yrs 137 billion yrs ago (our furthest understanding) is 400,000yrs from the emergence point of all the energy on an on going basis thus constantly adding mater etc to our known universe? brI'll put the kettle on!!!
Comment from : Ger Brady

A lot of stuff and nonsense!!!!!!
Comment from : Ian Ian

Formula for that squiggly graph must be something to behold
Comment from : Ian Ian

"Infinity and beyond" (?) Metastable evolution of the standing wave function, (of duration not "size"), where information "turns over" at the "top" of the integrated connection, (at "absolute" zero), because unity in temporal - temporary-uncertain existence, is self*-defining a quantized number sequence of primary resonance states, in proportion, in the interval 1-0 omnidirectional/omnidimensional superposition - quantum singularity-now brbrAs an extract and abstraction of the terminology used in mathematical preconditions, concepts point to an objective calculation of the pivotal qualitative functions related to identified-quantized quantities derived by reverse principle (reciprocal) from physical entities Eg atom smashing rewinds from the images obtained to calculate "initial conditions" in the universe brbr The singularity-now is a universal constant of all information and proportions of continuity (Or, what is the topic again? Reiteration development cycles of changing shapes)brbrThe concept of the Quantum connection is projected as a phase-interference information state, (M-theory), condensed from self*-measured time into energy, space and matter, so if one realizes, (makes an interpretation of perceived reality), that physical existence is the phase-locked, or located projection (observation equivalent) of time, from "here-now" (zero point origin coordinate), the inherent knowledge of mechanism by experience, interference self-measurement in quantization, is the natural world - and detachment or displacement of "self*" is the source of "mystery" that is a perception problem brIe a computer technician could explain the function of the mechanism of devices that produce screen images in a way that conveys these concepts, detached from the universal principle, and consolidate the misunderstandings about what reality actually is (Don't do it)brThe world IS - Definitively QuantumbrbrAnd "fun to imagine", which is why "i" is safe to imagine as the space into which unity, the 1 identity will fit exactly, probability into possibility brbrQuantum universe, timespace, is the integrated quality of space (vacuum), containing (singularity-unity function of equations), as the projected observable identity quantities of difference, as objective objects in spacetime which is the +/- 1 @zero triplet of digital dualitybrbrSelf* :- The word "self" is ambiguous, but that's how it is in an all-inclusive infinite state, as a matter-sense perception-measurement of relative proportion, fitted by evolution and thought to an "attitudinal" position in the universe
Comment from : David Wilkie

All connection, forever, involving the evolution of humanity and perceptions of meaning as emergent, IS-ness
Comment from : David Wilkie

fine heart you make me smile: One ten billionth of a second is our linear notion of time in regards to the soundless big bang The fact that the name big bang is used as a picture of description should point out our human entanglement 'with' understanding If there is only continuation, time been a language used as a fathom of distance in regards to a part of movement of this continuation, than one ten billionth of a second relates to scale of present perceivable as viewable size, before this linear point still exists infinity A lot can happen in the absent separation or division springs to mind brPS infinity is a possible amount that will exist when needed in regards to actual usage between the physical and life is is isbrbrkeep up the good intention "integrity is everything" remembering the human minds are a quantum moment within and part of the living universe br/ friend
Comment from : ian whelan

If you heard the ultraviolet catastrophe quantisation solution explained here for the first time count yourself lucky YouTube is full of videos purporting to explain it but not doing so Prof Turok gives the best analogy out there There is a fourteen year old Indian kid who comes close as well :) Forget the rest
Comment from : Comprehensiveboy Comprehensiveboy

Does this huge density of matter , close to the origin , means the universe has been a black hole at a certain moment ?
Comment from : VITA kyo

Is it possible to make a tridimensionnal map of the universe in real time ? I mean with all objects in their present position instead of seen back in time
Comment from : VITA kyo

Are laws of gravitation correct ? Imagine two stars of equal mass , but the density of one of them is far superior to the other , is space bended the same way ?
Comment from : VITA kyo

Gee just a few weeks ago the fad in physics was to claim that time doesn't exist Turok proposes a theory that requires time to exist before the beginning of the current universe I like that - I think I was always partial to time for sentimental reasons
Comment from : moby dick

Excellent talk Much to learn and wonder about
Comment from : Jerry Elizondo

What if the big bang was not the beginning but the end of the universe ?
Comment from : RetroSimon

It was not Euler who discovered the number e, but Jacob Bernoulli
Comment from : Be Free

Could listen to this man, all day long
Comment from : Deckie Deckie

The ancient Mayans and ancient Egyptians were measuring time long before Anaxomander came along
Comment from : D T

Zero in infinity is/are congruent vanishing point/s? Nested loops? Beyond measure, at the limits?brbrBig Bang theory is the new physics version of the "Fountain of youth" story
Comment from : David Wilkie

Neil T nailed it "the Universe is the Divine" Dark matter and energy are the realm of evil The LIGHT is moving towards Sagittarius A and the "ALL" We are all on a learning excursion in the "interesting in-betweens" that is governed by the our portion of the Light, ie the Nash EquilibriumThere's all the answers you are looking for Neil T Keep on trying to climb over the wallEvery time you open your mouth you prove again that Joseph Smith was a prophet
Comment from : Russell Williams

So this would mean that the universe is infinitely old with no cause?
Comment from : Cameron Belt

This lecture is one of the best on YouTube, Dr Neil Turok is always a pleasure to listen to
Comment from : climbeverest

everything begins and therefore ENDs
Comment from : ben Bucy

Just announced that gravitational waves have been detected
Comment from : Robert Brandywine

A surprisingly lucid talk dealing with some very difficult ideas One of the best I've seenbrThanks for posting!
Comment from : Adam Mangler

LOL, the people peeking in the window behind the lecturerGreat lecture tho
Comment from : clawpuss2

The square root of -1 arises not because there is an "imaginary" aspect of the universe, it is instead a consequence of the asymmetrical foundation of our mathematical number line Positive and negative numbers are not mirror images of each other, they combine by different rules that produce asymmetrical results In contrast to the asymmetrical polarity of the mathematical number line, electromagnetic waves exhibit a type of polarity that is perfectly symmetrical - neither charged state is inherently either positive or negative While our mathematical formulas are valid and self-consistent, their asymmetrical properties produce counter-intuitive "imaginary" results when used to model inherently symmetrical physical phenomena
Comment from : Lish Lash

3:36
Comment from : MikeRoePhonicsMusic

Nice to hear a serious physicist challenge the popular universe models of our day
Comment from : AI fan

Sounds nice, but infinity does not existbrbrThe universe only covers a certain amount of things and numbers because the universe is not infinite
Comment from : Sing Sang

yes god is wery logic thinking, progress male or shemale god godess? Fuuck
Comment from : Jocke Bergman

This lecture is held in the most stupid theatre i have ever seen
Comment from : P Krakras

did they ever find the higgs boson?
Comment from : Mikael

A double torus works at micro and macro level of universe- though not a mathematician or physicist, I have perceived this reality from the particulate level to whole universal system level which works by virtue of "Principle and Design" built on ratios- It explains everything sensibly and was built by pure imagination by Grace But physicists obsessed with bottling nature into mathematical language have failed to take note in spite of personally writing to them - I am sure that there is time ahead when humanity will be forced rethink its foundation - This will happen but I am not sure after how much destruction – Our ego often stands between the simple Truth of Nature and we the human beingsbr wwwscribdcom/doc/208568404/The-String-Atom-of-Life-Soul-Consciousness-and-Future-Technologies
Comment from : John Paily

0:32:25 He says that the vacuum energy is repulsive because it stays the same no matter how fast the vacuum moves Can anyone shed some light upon this relation or give a reference?
Comment from : Laureano Luna

That's interesting The numbers and equations break down and our language can no longer be used to express ourselves properly That leaves an evolved state of mind as the only solution
Comment from : gmshadowtraders

Once you start saying that something can appear from nothing, that energy can be present in an empty vacuum of space, that energy and matter can be invisible, that the big bang is the beginning but it may not be the only beginning, that time only goes forward even though the equations are reversible in time, that there are an infinite number of possibilities for the universe (including total collapse) but the universe is likely to keep expanding is it any wonder why the models break down?
Comment from : gmshadowtraders

This was a fantastic lecture by a special man I would like to know how his theory compares to the bleak future that Lawrence Krauss paints of the universe
Comment from : ElSmusso

Either Neil Turok or Morgan Freeman could narrorate my life I don't care
Comment from : Doctor Bonkus

I assume President of a Canadian institute of some sort
Comment from : Dan Childs

Great lecture, would listen again
Comment from : Jordan Phillips

oh ,what great problem
Comment from : minakshi sinha

I agree
Comment from : Kevin Friesen

Pretty facetious to say you don't mean to insult, and in the next sentence calling me ignorant I enjoyed the lecture, indeed, I have watched many of Mr Turok's lectures and always found him interesting, well spoken, and very good at conveying to the layman difficult concepts I merely made light of a small mistake I suppose doing that confirms my ignorance? We are doomed if everybody is as angry and sad as you, scanning the net looking for targets for your rage Relax, eh?
Comment from : Kevin Friesen

an hour long plus lecture on physics, concerning our very existence- and you come away with a question like that? I am not trying to insult you, but i just dont understand-- your ignorance is baffling please do better or we are all doomed
Comment from : Robert Bradley