Real vs Fake Slow Motion | Chronos 2.1 vs Sony a7S III

Video quality	The size	Download

Information Real vs Fake Slow Motion | Chronos 2.1 vs Sony a7S III

Title	:	Real vs Fake Slow Motion \| Chronos 2.1 vs Sony a7S III
Lasting	:	5.12
Date of publication	:
Views	:	23 rb

I will see you !
Comment from : Blue Sky

or you can get an Sony RX100 mark IV or higher
Comment from : id deegee

Nice video bro, thanks a lot
Comment from : Bruno Leite

Chronos 21 FOR SURE
Comment from : Ahmad Algammal

Try the plug-in Twixtor It will finetune the slowmotion to perfection!
Comment from : VildPlockad

Ah, now I know why Topaz Labs Video AI used name Chronos SlowMo for its AI model to fake slow motion, lol I though it was arbitrary names :D By the way, a faster way to fake slow motion in similar quality as Topaz is with AI from DavinciResolve, I think only in studio version Its called the "Speed Warp" setting in the Re-time Process settings of the clip I have done some tests with it vs Topaz slow motion and they are very comparable, and in some situations Resolve is better, and always faster Give it a try next time Cheers!
Comment from : Krunoslav Stifter

Has any high speed camera had slow motion at 1000fps THAT smooth prior to the Chronos? And if so, how long has the technology been around That is some SUPER smooth slow motion, moreso than any other slow motion I have seen before on other YouTube videos
Comment from : ZerogunRivale

What about the Sony Rx100 IV? That can shoot 1,000 fps, why isn't it ever talked about? Because it can't shoot it in hd?
Comment from : altered states

My biggest problem with the Sony footage wasn't even the chops It was the image quality Chronos lighting looked darker and fuller I have an LG C2 OLED to look at it from, though
Comment from : Red Pill Jesus

Cronos wins hands down in my opinion Thanks for the test 🙏🏻👍
Comment from : The Weedy Garden

Chrono no doubt
Comment from : AVX

"taste the chopiness" brBrad, you dont have to do Sony like that xD
Comment from : Asher Skylark

Haha, I about blew my milk through my nose when I saw the 'Cocaine free" popup!
Comment from : Graph Guy

Hey Brad! Awesome comparison-this was super helpful! Do you know if canon RF mounts work with the Chronos 21? Thank you!
Comment from : Tim Chuon

Hey there Brad, for 120fps product videos on the Sony A7s3 what lights would you recommend?
Comment from : Andreas Triantafillou

a7s III nope
Comment from : durrsky

obviously not good enough,slowing down 4 times with optical flow is just too much,also big difference in image quality that 1080 from chronos looks amazing
Comment from : Jai F

Def a difference
Comment from : cybercab

Hi Brad try to shoot with a shutter speed of 1000 on the Sony A7sIII and use Twixtor Pro for Premiere or AE… gives much better results
Comment from : Picture Pulse

On the A7Siiii, if you use the 240fps, but set your shutter speed to 1/4000 or even 1/8000, you'll get very crisp frames for Optical Flow to use to fill in the in-between to make it appear to be up to 1000fps I've done this and it works incredibly well on some shots The absolute key is to shoot at that extremely high shutter speed Just using optical flow on 240fps with 1/500 shutter speed gives you that warpy, weird motion because the computer doesn't have enough sharp information to estimate the motion from one frame to the next
Comment from : goodeggpro

what's the difference between Samsung note mobile " 960 FPS vs cronos 21 , 40 fps is not so much difference ?
Comment from : Fact Night

As I thought Motion morphing artifacts on manipulated Sony slow mo You can also see this on some TV adverts when the DOP forgot to (or was too lazy to) film key product shots twice One at normal speed and one at slow mo speed
Comment from : stuCameraman1

life is a toilet
Comment from : j5

Thank you
Comment from : Mutant

Not even closethe Chronos crushes at the A7Siii during this test
Comment from : Vince Venom

Things like Twixtor could have better effects, or even better - Topaz AI has a slow motion feature, but still, none of these techniques match up to the real 1000fps !
Comment from : TheMrLeoniasty

Thank you for making this VideobrI have the A7siii and I love itbrThe fake Slow Motion looks cool, but it doesn't satisfy me brI desperately desire the Chronos 😭brbut I would like it to shoot 4k 😔
Comment from : Uncle Seven

240 fps interpolated to 1000 fps looks very fake to me compared to real 1000 fps from Chronos, but to be fair, the algorithms you used are very old and far from state of the art Nowadays you can find dedicated solutions that use deep learning that apply the motion smoothing in a context-aware fashion, providing much better results! Unfortunately these tools are not that well known outside of the machine learning / computer vision industry yet Check out Rife-App or Dain-App
Comment from : Digital Ghosts

ya cant beat the real thing but dam 7k for a camera just for a hobby is a little too much honestly its not even aimed for the average consumer the company is so funny, "made it for the average consumer" wtf the price of a car lol crazy how marketing works these days
Comment from : FC FGD

plastic ice
Comment from : sclogse1

I really appreciate your videos featuring the Chronos camera I am very close to pulling the trigger and purchasing the Chronos 21 HD myself Are you happy over all with it? If you had the choice to make again, would you still get it?brbrThanks again!
Comment from : Edward Boe

Yeah, I have a Chronos 14, and it's definitely better to have the added frames and the flexibility of a variety of super high frame rates While software is getting better when it comes to interpolating frames, it still won't be as good as real frames (at least as of now) Future prove me wrong hehe
Comment from : Chinito Pinoy

No software can beat the real stuff Optical flow and pixel Motion works at their best only when there is fluid in the shot Rest of the times it always fails and gives away Chronos is definitely a must have for dedicated slow Motion And 240 fps from sony is enough for cinematic stuff Both are meant for different purposes
Comment from : Jay Nikam

I don't think it's a fair comparison when you get the interpolation so wrong No disrespect or anything, but I convert 120fps to 1000fps a lot and it's as smooth as silk I use it for action shots of people I'm not sure why yours is looking so incredibly choppy but you're doing something wrong either accidentally or intentionally (because this is perhaps a paid promotion for Chronos?)brbrEven the basic optical flow settings in Davinci Resolve are vastly smoother than your results In yours it's like you had no interpolation turned on at all Honestly, did you make the interpolated footage that choppy on purpose? If not, are you aware now, with hindsight, that your results went terribly wrong somehow?brbrEdit: I see the Chronos affiliate link in the description That explains everything
Comment from : Benson

Love the Sony A7SiiibrPersonally my fav camera But I 100 want to Chronos as it's just not the same trying to manipulate the 240 Well worth it if your serious about taking your slow mo footage to the next level
Comment from : FreeRideInk MTB

Chronos 21 wins big time clearly
Comment from : Aurangzaib Zafar

you can trick that with any camera that shoots at 240fps, just set the shutter as you would if you had the possibility to shoot at 1000fps, it works great with steady shots
Comment from : Daniel Ferph

Sony faked slo-mo looks terrible, useless for anything professional JMHO
Comment from : RETRO MoGraph

thank you for sharing would you please also share the link of the blue ring or from where you purchase it, i would appreciate that
Comment from : 肖凌

Very nice comparisson
Comment from : Fidel Tshivhasa

is NOT good enough even using all the programs, all the restults are mediocre :(
Comment from : LatinGoddessGame

For me Cronos look much beter and if you have very fast speed scenes you can't capture with those 240fps
Comment from : Onisim Aslam

I use my sony fs5 240but there are rare moments that i use the 480 frames While i still have not ordered the chronos i will settle with my fs5 The chronos look way smoother and natural compared to ae and pp edits
Comment from : Ronnel Cuison

Nice content and channel Subscribed
Comment from : Feyso

Hmm but what about video enhance ai and twixtor? i also have the a7siii and wonder if i can fake it because the cronos is a bit expensive 😂
Comment from : The Bommel

Zero competition the Sony footage looks garbage in terms of slow mo
Comment from : Ferhan Khan Photography

No doubt - Chronos wins
Comment from : CREAM OF STATIC PICTURES

I would say, it depends what you are looking forbrIf you are looking for beautiful, bice colored clips, you may take the SONYbrIf you need high speed footage for studies, you are clearly better off with the CRONOS
Comment from : Marco S

chronos is 46666667 times better!
Comment from : Tauhid Miltoln

Okay, watched all the way through It seemed to me the extra frames in the Chronos showed off the sparkle in the droplets I would LOVE to see more side by side comparisons Thanks
Comment from : Translucent Studios

"All the lights" LOL
Comment from : Translucent Studios